Narco analysis and article 20 3

State of karnataka & ors, wherein the question was- whether involuntary administration of scientific techniques namely narcoanalysis, polygraph (lie detector) test and brain electrical activation profile (beap) test violates the 'right against self- incrimination' enumerated in article 20(3) of the constitution in answer, it was. Article 20(3) of the constitution of india and narco analysis – blending the much awaited “throughout the web of english criminal law, one golden thread is always to be seen, that it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt”# • article 20 (3) - no person accused of any offence. The legal standpoint on narco analysis in india has not been clearly pronounced by the courts this paper addresses narco analysis in the indian legal system the major issues dealt with being, its constitutionality in relation to article 20 (3) and 21 as well as its statutory sanction under the code of criminal procedure also. This allows a thorough analysis of the truth about lie –detectors 6 dr jitendra tiwari and abhay chand mall visen, “narco analysis and article 20(3) of the constitution of india,50 civil & military law journal(2014) 7 ajay kr barnwal, dr sn ambedkar, “narco-analysis test: an analysis of various judgements of. Hence, reliance on the contents of compelled testimony comes within the prohibition of article 20(3) but its use for the purpose of identification or corroboration with facts already known to the investigators is not barred 146 it is quite evident that the narco analysis technique involves a testimonial act. This article focuses on legality of practicing of narco analysis test people on whom this test is conducted often allege it to be violation of their right to self- incrimination guaranteed under article 20(3) of the constitution of india this article analyzes whether such test is actually violating any such. (read: what is narco analysis) the verdict is a serious setback for the central bureau of investigation ( cbi ) which argued that all their tests are legally sanctioned and are critical in cases where they can help provide evidence of crimes being committed the court, however, held that article 20 (3) of the.

narco analysis and article 20 3 Tests such as narco analysis and brain mapping cannot be done on a person without his consent the supreme court has ruled that if a person is forced to take such tests, it is a violation of article 20(3) of the constitution which gives an accused the right to remain silent as a safeguard against being forced.

Regarding the legal status of narco-analysis, one needs to interpret carefully the article 20(3) of the indian constitution and section 161(2) of the criminal procedure code, 1973 the application of narco-analysis test involves the fundamental question pertaining to the judicial matters and also human. This article describes how the techniques may be used against an accused and concludes that although the legal setup in india may limit the evidentiary use of the techniques, their extensive deployment the narco-analysis test, the bar as mentioned in article 20(3) would be attracted even if the statements in such a test. Hello before i answer this brilliant question i would like to amend the few terms of this question using the term accused and/or suspects instead of the term convict as the one who is already a convict does not require to go under any sort of test to prove further that he is actually a convict to understand this question one.

In 2004, the bombay high court ruled in the multi-crore-rupee fake stamp paper case that subjecting an accused to certain tests like narcoanalysis does not violate the fundamental right against self-incrimination article 20(3) of the constitution guarantees this: no person accused of any offence shall be. Online international interdisciplinary research journal, {bi-monthly}, issn2249- 9598, volume-iv, march 2014 special issue wwwoiirjorg issn 2249-9598 page 409 constitutional validity of narco analysis test under article 20(3) of the constitution of india with reference to judicial pronouncements kalpana v jawale. Clause (3) of article 20[i] of the indian constitution, 1950 provides that “no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against be characterised as criminal proceedings compulsory narco-analysis test amounts to 'testimonial compulsion' and attracts protection under article 20(3.

3 mr awadh tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that such tests like narcoanalysis and others are violative of articles 20 (3) and 21 of the constitution of india as well as the provisions contained in sub-section (2) of section 161 of the crpc, as the accused / suspect cannot. This study provides in brief the method and historical perspective of narcoanalysis, polygraph & beap tests technique the main aim of this study is to analyze the evidentry value, legality and constitutional validity of narcoanalysis, polygraph & beap tests coming within the prohibition contemplated by article 20(3. Mentioned article in truth serum trial by anupama katakam, she has analysed the narcoanalysis tests on the backdrop of constitutional and legal provisions attracting the bar of article 20(3) 3 whether the involuntary administration of the impugned techniques is a reasonable restriction on `personal liberty.

Narco analysis poses several questions at the intersection of law, medicine and ethics is the procedure for narco analysis is violative of the rights against self incrimination, guaranteed under article 20 (3) of constitution it figured prominently in the news recently when it became eye of storm and sparked off the debate. It is alleged that narco-analysis test is violative of his fundamental rights under article 20(3) of the constitution of india, 1950 [2] it guarantees protection against self incrimination [3] the fifth amendment to the us constitution [4] provides for the same privilege [5] this right is also guaranteed by article 14(3)(g) of the. The bench said: “article 20 (3) aims to prevent the forcible conveyance of personal knowledge that is relevant to the facts in issue the results obtained from each of the impugned tests bear a testimonial character and they cannot be categorised as material evidence” narco analysis technique involves the.

Narco analysis and article 20 3

One of the case said courts could not direct the prosecution to hold narco analysis, brain mapping and lie detector tests against the will of the accused as it would be violative of article 20 (3) of the constitution the main provision regarding crime investigation and ballb (hons) – iii year, dr ram manohar lohiya. Article 20 (3) says that no person accused of an offence “shall be compelled to be a witness against himself” in its landmark judgment, the sc said, “ no individual should be forcibly subjected to any of the techniques in question, whether in the context of investigation in criminal cases or otherwise.

Constitutionality ➤ is it a violation of article 20 (3) article 20 (3) of constitution of india states- “no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself” that is law or authority cannot compel a person (an accused) by force or otherwise to give testimony against himself. Legal status on 5th may 2010 supreme court of indiaconcluded following point wrt this test article 20(3) of the indian constitution-no person accused of any offence shall becompelled to be a witness against himself the test result can't be admitted asevidence if they have been obtained.

Aid for collecting evidence and helps the investigation so it cannot amount to testimonial compulsion as given under article 20(3) in the case of dinesh dalmia vs state12, the madras high court while hearing the case held that the scientific tests such as polygraph, brain mapping and narco analysis conducted on accused. Article 20 (3) of constitution of india and narco analysis: in any criminal investigation, interrogation of the suspects and accused plays a vital role in extracting the truth from them. Activation profile (beap) test' cannot be equated with 'testimonial compulsion' because the test subject is not required to give verbal answers, thereby falling outside the protective scope of article 20(3) it was further ruled that the verbal revelations made during a narcoanalysis test do not attract the bar of article 20(3) since. Whether narco analysis test is violative of article 19, 20(3) or 21 of constitution of india, (2) whether narco analysis is injurious to health and thereby illegal,(3) whether narco analysis test can be conducted without consent these are questions to be considered in these petitions 2 the investigating.

narco analysis and article 20 3 Tests such as narco analysis and brain mapping cannot be done on a person without his consent the supreme court has ruled that if a person is forced to take such tests, it is a violation of article 20(3) of the constitution which gives an accused the right to remain silent as a safeguard against being forced. narco analysis and article 20 3 Tests such as narco analysis and brain mapping cannot be done on a person without his consent the supreme court has ruled that if a person is forced to take such tests, it is a violation of article 20(3) of the constitution which gives an accused the right to remain silent as a safeguard against being forced.
Narco analysis and article 20 3
Rated 4/5 based on 41 review

2018.